Wednesday 13th, March 2013, 10 years ago, Kali Linux v1.0 was first released. Today we want to celebrate Kali’s 10th anniversary!
Time has flown. And gosh, a lot has changed since then!
They grow up so fast!
This is the story of how Kali came to be, and some of the challenges along the way.
How did we get to where we are today? There is a quick answer, and a not so quick answer.
What had started off as a “quick small thing” for single assessment, had started to gain traction. With Whoppix growing in popularity, it was becoming harder to develop for. At the time, Slax had a more mature toolchain for generating Live-CDs and working with OverlayFS. Thus it was a better suited option.
Editors note: We cannot say for certain, but the image file size may have become an issue. With more tools wanting to be added, space was running out. This was at a time when CD-R were at their peak, giving you 650-700 MB and USB media was not yet on the scene. By switching to Slax, the base OS size dropped, and allowed for more custom packages to be included as well as tighter compression (LZMA). Overall, this gave a lot more space to grow.
Walking around Black Hat USA 06, the team noticed how many people were using their project, and offering training using it. After listening to a few sales pitches, and training offerings, the team noticed just how many people were getting it wrong. As a result, OffSec (previously known as Offensive Security), was created. Training from the people who made the tools. Who else would know it better?!
BackTrack now had a stable, mature Live-CD project and it was exactly what was needed for the problem which was air-gap networks at the time. Whilst these Live-CDs were the answer for some scenarios, the team wanted to expand into more areas. The cost of USB flash drives/sticks had came down dramatically, as a result were more freely available. There was then a shift to “Live-Boot” (either CDs or USBs). The next item to solve would be getting their data to be “persistent” rather than losing it when powered off. Enter BackTrack 3 in June 2008.
With computer hardware getting more powerful each year, using virtual machine became more accessible. Users then started to want to be able to install BackTrack. The community started to contribute guides on how to manually install BackTrack, as well as creating an official tutorial via the terminal.
The goal was now clear, BackTrack needed an “easy” installer. A graphical one happened in BackTrack 4 “Pre-Final” in June 2009. Domain
The team knew how much BackTrack was growing in popularity, and as they did not switch the project name when using Ubuntu, it was time to create its own place on the Internet. With the launch the first stable release of BackTrack 4 in January 2010, the project got its own domain (backtrack-linux.org) and moved off remote-exploit.
When the team started work switching from Slax to Ubuntu, they grabbed the latest release at the time (8.10 – Intrepid Ibex). As this was not a “Long-Term Support” (LTS) release, upstream would only support it until April 2010 – one year & six months.
This means, towards the end of this version, updates became fewer, packaging became harder, and workload increased. Things were not as stable as when it was first released.
It was not until May 2011 that the next major version of BackTrack got released, which also happens to be the last, BackTrack 5. This time, it was based on Ubuntu 10.04 (Lucid Lynx) LTS. This gave three years of support from upstream.
Upgrading from BackTrack 4 to BackTrack 5 meant doing a complete re-install (two other Ubuntu in-between,
9.xx!). Even though there was a packaging update system in-place, there was not an upgrade path. This was still the same behavior as when using Slax.
Same mentality as Live-boot: replace the OS for each release, not upgrade.
It did not make for a good end-user experience. All their data, any custom programs they installed, all the customizations to their machines, would be lost when switching to the latest version. As a result, it meant that people were reluctant to upgrade, as it would be a lengthy process for them.
The team had their new challenge to try and overcome. Final Fresh Start
For the next few years, the team was busy working away, doing what they do best. However, they started to run into various problems again. As these problems started to accumulate, it was clear that a re-build was required once again,
for the final time. As so much had changed, the project would not get away with not swapping names. They needed to drive home just how much change there was. BackTrack Linux became Kali Linux in March 2013. You can read more of technical limitations here, as well as why the name, Kali.
Kali 1.0 (Moto) first saw the light of day at Black Hat Europe 2013 and was based on Debian 7. With the new infrastructure in place, building and publishing images became more automated and simplified. As a result, there were multiple revisions made to address bug fixes and even a minor update. This gave a better experience for users, as they were not having to wait months for an updated image.
The team then waited for Debian 8 to be released, before pushing out Kali 2.0 (Sana) in August 2015 (at Black Hat USA 15 & DEF CON 23). This time, for the first time, people could upgrade their systems between major project updates! It did require a very minor alteration for the end-user to be able to do this
(updating apt’s source to use the new codename). Moving to Rolling
Overall, the feedback received for Kali 2.0 was positive, and it was a success. One of the reasons it was so well received was because of the updated versions of most packages.
In information security (infosec) there is the need to be on the latest version. This is often because: Being a developer, you may need the latest feature which has just been added. Being a system administrator, a patch could contain a security update to stop a vulnerability.
Writing exploits or developing infosec tools is no exception, they often need to have access to the latest libraries.
Debian is stable, and that is because they only update their stable release about every two years, in order for packages to then be the latest tested version. They will manually “backport” updates to patch any security vulnerabilities for older versions in order to fix that version of the package
As two years is a very long time in infosec to wait to get an update, users were following bad practices in order to attempt to get the latest version. At times, they would break their setup in the process.
The team had their new challenge to try and overcome!
To help understand why, it may take up to two years to get a package updated in stable. However, that does not mean its not ready before then as there is a whole workflow behind it. There is a branch called “testing”, which is for packages that are ready to into stable, but only when the time is ready for every package. A package will start in “unstable”, and once it passes Debian’s strict package testing process will it make it into testing. There are numerous packages upgrades in testing that never make it into stable, which would be in a stable state to release.
This felt like a good balance of being stable and up-to-date for Kali team.
As soon as Kali 2.0 was out of the door, the Kali team knew what they had to do. Move from “Debian stable” to “Debian testing”.
5 months later, January 2016 Kali become a rolling distribution with Kali 2016.1.
From this point forwards, the Kali team would take a “snapshot” of the network repository, test and then release that. This is because updates are continuously happening from “Debian testing”.
Snapshots are now taken about once a quarter, giving four major releases a year, rather than doing it a few months after Debian’s stable release once every two years.
Believe it or not, there is even more to the story where can go into more detail. If this is something you would like, let us know! Dragon Logo
Throughout the projects, one item has been constant. The logo. The dragon. To the point that the logo is potentially better known than the project itself!
What originally started out to be a competition, originating on the Whoppix forum, the idea was “best graphic will be the next wallpaper”. The first submission that was awarded the winner, was the dragon. We liked it so much, we never re-opened the competition for the next version!
What we did not know at the time, was that the submission was plagiarized. It was taken from deviantart without the authors permission. We tracked down the rightful author and bought out the rights to it for Kali Linux.
The design of the dragon has been slightly tweaked over the years, by altering here and there such as making it thinner in places
(put on a diet!), curving the tail a little more etc. But we have always been careful to protect the iconic image as it is one of the most recognizable logos in this space. And to answer the question, we have no plans to ever replace the dragon logo. Left, Old. Right, New BackTrack 6?
Rather than releasing BackTrack 6, Kali 1.0 (Moto) came out instead. But why? With BackTrack 3 -> 4 (Slax to Ubuntu), why not with BackTrack 5 -> 6 (Ubuntu -> Debian)?
Why was there such a fresh start and not keep the momentum going?
Well, a few new problems had started to arise, some technical, others not, and the team knew that one day they would need to find for solutions, such as:
Ubuntu worked well for a number of years, however the team were increasingly finding that they were running into technical issues, causing limitations. At the time, if someone found an issue with a package on BackTrack, if it was not something custom to BackTrack, it would need to go “upstream” to Ubuntu. As Ubuntu uses Debian as its base, if they have not forked the package, it would need to then go to Debian to solve it. Then when a patch is created, it would need to be pushed into Debian, to be pulled into Ubuntu, to be pulled into BackTrack. This was a lengthy procedure. Otherwise, the team would have to fork a package, thus taking on ownership and responsibility of maintenance, to include a patch.
With more packages requiring forks, more time was spent maintaining the OS rather than security focused aspects, which took the fun out of the team as it became more of a nightmare.
The decision was made to cut out the middle layer, to use Debian as the base, rather than Ubuntu. Upstream direction
By also using another OS as your base, you often follow their direction for their project. You can alter, but it does add additional complexity when synchronizing (think
git rebase). This takes time and focus away from what makes BackTrack, BackTrack! Ubuntu had announced a major desktop environment change. Going from GNOME as their default to something they had created, Unity (and Mir). At the time, it had caused a bit of controversy. We also knew that certain tools would not be compatible.
Editors note: Whoppix & Whax both used KDE as the default Desktop Environment, and we switched to GNOME when using Ubuntu.
We also did not know just how difficult it ended up being to fully customise Ubuntu. At the time the Ubuntu developers had put various restrictions in place to stop things which we needed to-do. We believe this was because they were trying to make a OS that was user-friendly for people first starting out, rather than for people who were experience with Linux, who would be trying to-do a penetration test.
If we were going to be using Debian, it is best to follow their rules. Therefore we needed to follow “the correct Debian standard for packaging”. This meant we had to abide by Linux’s Filesystem Hierarchy Standard (FHS). This was introduced right back in the start with Whoppix so people had gotten used to
/pentest directory, and liked it. However, it was a reason why the project had stability issues, thus users may have issues upgrading. It was not the best way to manage or maintain packages. The upside is, programs got added to
$PATH, allowing you to call a program from any location!
The lack of FHS was hurting us in many different ways. Because of packages not being in the expected Linux location, we had to manually create links for libraries. This was of course a dependency nightmare. As you then expected, it was painful to update packages due to the amount of work, thus tools became outdated.
This was also a reason why you should not have added BackTrack’s network repository to another OS! Plus if you started to try an install things outside of BackTrack’s network repository, it was only too easy to have a knock on effect breaking something else. It was not right to be so worry to perform an update, as simple updates may break installs.
Because of Debian’s standards, for end users, it helped to make packages more stable as well has having defined path for updates and upgrades. For us developers, maintaining a package also became easier. As a result, we can:
Look at a package’s metadata, so we know where the code upstream is (where it lives) Have alerts when there has been an updated release out upstream Use tools that are design to download and updated code Import the update code Update any necessary metadata, keeping it up-to-date and relevant And include the original archive (in another git branch)
So all we have to do is build the package locally, test it to make sure it works. Then sign off on it, by adding our digital signatures to the packages (so it came from us and not tampered/altered by any malicious party), before uploading the package source to the build bots, which will re-compile it for every supported architecture. Simple!
This mature workflow helps prevent all the odd weird edge cases that were causing users machines to break by doing simple updates. This helps make the system more robust.
The above talks about packages, but another item to call out is the images. We could then be used to bootstrap builds, allowing for custom images to be generated, such as giving the flexibility for switching between desktop environments creation (GNOME? KDE? Xfce? Something else? Go for it!). Plus, it would support pre-seed answer files during setup, allowing to do unattended fully automate installs.
This is more of a correct way of doing things, rather than a hacky job e.g. generate the files, rather than relying on post-install scripts to modify afterwards. ARM – multi architecture
Since BackTrack 4, the option was there for ARM support. We then experimented and released ARM support with BackTrack 5. At this point, we knew this was something we wanted to explore more going forwards. At the time, there was a lot of manual work involved, creating chroots for each device (started with Motorola Xoom). With BackTrack, we were forced to build the image, on the device itself, which does not scale well at wanting to support more device. Debian would not only allow for us to do that, but streamlined the process. At this point, we were able to treat ARM as a first-class citizen going forwards. This has been accelerated with Ampere’s infrastructure support.
With BackTrack, we were using subversion for our control system. We were starting to get requests for governments, as they wanted to use our OS internally. However, there was were sticking points. We needed to digitally sign our packages, and they needed to be able to compile the OS themselves internally.
As we were scrapping it all and starting from scratch when starting with Kali, we moved to Git and used GPG to tag releases, at the same time, published all our build-scripts allowing anyone to build Kali on any platform. This made Kali truly open-source.
At the same time as the switch, we did some big internal changes. We originally set up our own public git server, but since then we have out grew it now migrated to GitLab and taken it to the next level. The team was growing, and we needed to start to scale, rather than having a few bottlenecks points. Another upside of this was to allow people to get source code of packages .
The team had really never used Ubuntu before, as a result, took multiple attempts to get a functioning eco-system (may not stretch as far as saying working systems!). This time, we did not want to make this mistake again, so we consulted the guy who
literally wrote the Debian handbook to get his advice and guidance to understand Debian’s way of doing things correctly from day 1.
We also setup dedicated build boxes, on various different architecture (as we wanted to support ARM). This allowed us for “CI/CD” for packages being built automatically, as well as nightly testing of images and system upgrades. We also setup unit testing for packages, allowing for testing to happen when importing from Debian.
We knew how important it was to have a functioning setup process, and it needs to be able to cover a lot of different scenarios. With the switch to Debian, we were able to add:
Full language support – Kali is not limited to English! Accessibility support – We were contacted by multiple blind penetration testers Straight to setup – We could now install straight from grub without having to boot into a live environment first Summary
Debian was picked as its one of the largest Linux distributions, community driven (thus open-source), and supports many different architectures & hardware. Rather than using an OS which is forked from Debian, thus adds another layer of complexity of who is “upstream,” it makes sense to go straight to the source. Then following Debian standards & polices had huge advantages for us.
The downside would mean a complete redesign & restructure. And we mean a complete re-do over. Everything from our infrastructure (package & image build bots, network mirror handling etc), the base operating system, our packages. Complete re-write. We stop focusing on BackTrack to focus secretly working away on Kali which took over a year.
Needless to say, it was a LOT of work, but it was completely worth doing it. Both from development team, streamlining so many aspects to giving a greater improvement to user experience.
If you want even more, you can look at at the original blog posts, as well as watch some talks about it:
BackTrack Reborn – Kali Linux Kali Linux 1.0 Release – Moto – The Birth of Kali Linux What’s New in Kali Linux? Kali’s Name Why is the name “Kali Linux”?
“Kali” was already a part of a team members vocabulary, and when it was put forwards internally, everyone liked it. There are various incorrect claims online of why we picked it (such as it standing for something) but really, we just liked it. Yes, it also means “strong” in Swahili, and is also a Hindu goddess.
We. Just. Liked it. How did you pick the name?
When coming up with the name, we knew we needed something that was cool, catchy, and unique. We did not want to step on any other projects toes in infosec realm, or even IT in general.
One evening at a Black Hat USA, the team was sitting around and trying to come up with a new name. They started coming up with initials of phrases, or merging abbreviations and even looked at coming up with a completely new word. Without any success, one of the team members instinctively went to what they do when naming a new pet; Pantheon names.
After making a list of of various Deities from as many mythologies, the team started looking up to see which had not yet been used in the Industry. Whilst there was a few terms the team really like, they were already in use by other projects. After looking up over 70 suggestions, only one really stood out, “Kali”. Kali is a Hindu Goddess of “Destruction and Rebirth”. It could not have been any better fitting; with one project ending, a new one starting. One of the team members ears twitched when they heard it as a suggestion, as they spoke Swahili, where “Kali” means “Strong”. After a little bit more understanding of the word, there is also a martial art also called “Kali”. Its style? All offense, no defense.
It felt like it was a sign, everything was pointing to “Kali”. It was the only name which came up strong, and there was not a reason not to use it. The team stopped the hunt for a name.
The word Kali has a lot of meaning to many different people.
Everyone is right, as it means something different to everyone. We. Just. Liked it. Screenshot Tour
They say “a picture is worth a thousand words”, so here is a trip down memory lane that’s worth £59,000:
Whoppix 2.x (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5) Whax 3.0 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6) BackTrack 1 (#1, #2, #3, Wallpaper) BackTrack 2 (#1, #2, #3) BackTrack 3 (#1, #2, #3, Wallpaper #1, Wallpaper #2) BackTrack 4 (#1, #2, #3, #4) BackTrack 5 (#1, #2, #3) Kali 1.0.x (#1, #2) Kali 1.1.x (#1, #2) Kali 2.x (#1, #2, #3) Kali 2019.4 (#1, #2, #3, #4) Kali 2020.2 (#1, #2, #3, #4) Kali 2020.4 (#1, #2) Kali 2021.2 (#1, #2) Kali 2022.1 (#1, #2, #3) Kali 2023.1 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5) Shells (#1) Today: The Present
And today, we have some presents to share with you! We are celebrating 10 years, with various different items.
First up, was the release of Kali 2023.1. We managed to release exactly on the 10 year anniversary date!
We try and not publicly give release dates, as there are many moving parts (outside of our control). This release was no exception, with multiple things breaking daily (Debian installer when trying to build the final RC image, Hugo image altering in our CI pipeline, and fall out from Python 3.11).
With this comes various features and changes, include the initial technical preview launch of “Kali Purple”. Kali has been doing 10 years of offensive (18.5 from Whoppix!), now Kali is starting to help the defensive side. You can read more about it in the release notes of Kali 2023.1, Kali Purple’s documentation, as well as watch the following talk from Adversary Village at RSAC 2023.
We also have an online event in the form of a Jeopardy Capture The Flag (CTF) happening over at 10year.kali.org. The puzzles are designed by the same people who where the first to solve the TV show Mr. Robot “Alternate Reality Game” (ARG) – Mr. Robot ARG Society. Enjoy and hope it keeps you busy for a while!
This challenge will only be “online” for two weeks, but we will offer it up afterwards to be able to download and run offline.
Check back on 10year.kali.org after closing to get the instructions. Song
We have once again worked with Uzimon, and now have a Kali tune! Give
Going Back to Kali a listen to, and feel free to download, use, and remix. Enjoy!
Audio (mp3), Video (mp4) and Lyrics
In case you missed the first songs:
OffSec: Uzimon – OffSec Say Try Harder! OffSec: Uzimon – Call OffSec BackTrack: Infected Mushroom – Project 100 Sneakers
Kali is now going sneakernet! No, really! We have Kali on sneakers.
This is a very unique and a collectors item.
These are Jordans, with Italian Nubuck and genuine Python (not Python 3.11, but the real thing!).
As these are for a limited time, as well as being handmade item, do expect the price tag to match it.
Please note: we are not on commission, we are not getting a cut of any sales price. 100% is going to the shoe maker. You can put your pre-order in here No longer taking orders.
You can view the mock ups still. PEN-200/PWK Refresh
From an OffSec side of things, they have had a trick up their sleeve and launched the refreshed PEN-200 (Pentesting With Kali) course. Everything from new material to a new format style of lab machines, but still keeping OSCP certificate.
For more information, please see their blog post, PDF, and FAQs.
Not only did we also do what has became our normal post-launch Discord session, we also did a “Ask Me Anything” (AMA), over on Reddit last week. You can read back over people’s questions and the teams answers.
If you missed it and you have any burning questions you would like the team to answer, feel free to stop by for the next Discord session. We are aiming to schedule them the first Tuesday after each Kali release. See you for Kali 2023.2!
Unfortunately, due to time constraints and personal events, we were unable to get our “kali4kids” ready in time. We were hoping to have this year’s special something early, but rather than rushing and reducing the quality, we are delaying it. Trust us, its going to be worth the wait.
Its also not an April Fools, its not being released on 1st April – promise! Tomorrow: The Future
So, where do we see Kali in the next 10 years?
Good question! In short: We do not know.
10 years ago we could not have predicted where we are today. And the same goes for now, we cannot predict the next 10 years.
What we can say is, we will continue with what we have already done and be responsive to the industry, pentesting, & market with how it develops over time with the goal of being at the forefront.
We need to be responsive to items which come up. Both from an upstream side of things (Debian), as well as the infosec industry.
With software, code gets updated. A perfect recent example of that is Python. Debian is getting ready to do its next stable release this summer. As a result, there are various stages in the release cycle to make this happen. Package maintainers are trying to make sure they have the latest version in, and as bug free as possible. Python is such a core part of an OS as so many scripts and packages rely on it, it is included in their first freeze. Python 3.11 has been “rushed” to make it into the upcoming stable release, as there are real improved performance. This then has a knock on-effect, as not everything may be compatible, either in Debian or Kali. After the updated Python was accepted, packages then get updated, pushed and tested against. There is a lot, and it does not happen all at once, but rather as each package then gets updated afterwards. As a result, bugs may trickle in as things change.
We also like to try and keep as close to Debian as possible, expect for where it makes sense to benefit us and our users. This means we can put more time into doing things that make Kali… Kali!
With technology, trends change. Live-CD were once “the in thing”, then persistent USB was “it”, which moved onto VMs, which gave way to containers, and currently “cloud” is in. Who knows what’s next!
In infosec, trends change as technology changes, software stacks change, attack surface changes, and defenses improve. As a result, we need to be able to adapt. At one stage, Wireless hacking “was the thing”, so we needed to support injection on as many cards as possible. Today, it is more “Command and Control”, “Cloud”, “Living off the Land”, and “Endpoint Detection and Response”.
We do not know what tomorrow will bring, but we need to be ready to react to it.
We have built up various internal technical debt, that we need to pay off.
Luckily nothing is more than 10 years old!
An item which we are able to talk about, is switching out our mirror redirector to a newer solution. We have had this since the start of Kali, and whilst it does work, it is becoming more feature limiting and unable to integrate with newer stacks.
Refreshing our CI solution we are using for our image building is another item which is long overdue. This will help detect build issues with our images and platforms quicker.
Once we have reduced as much of the debt as we can, we will be in a much stronger position to be able to push forwards, and quicker than if we were to do any future items now. We are aiming then to ride on the development momentum, to build excitement up in the community.
Like Kali Purple, Kali is going defensive. This is a new area for Kali, currently we have only scratched the surface. We want to go deeper and break into more infosec areas as well!
We are looking for ideas and suggestions to please come and get involved with what you would like to see Kali Purple turn into.
Kali is an Open-Source project. Previously we have been doing things behind closed doors, but we have been doing more in the public eye. But we can do more. We want to do even more in the open as possible. We are wanting to feed and help community contributions grow.
…One thing that is certain however, we do not plan on changing the projects name. Kali is here to stay!
Over the years there has been some activity in different areas. Below we have pieced together some things which may be of interest to some of you.
Over the years, the team has given various different talks about the projects. They could be more of a deep dive of a certain platform or feature, but below are ones more of a higher level overview:
2013-07-17: OISF 2013 Martin Bos Kali Linux Backtrack Linux reborn @ Ohio Information Security Forum 2017-12-05: Kali Linux’s Experience of a Derivative Tracking Debian Testing @ Debconf 16 Trailer Videos
Over the years, we have done videos to show off the project. Here is a collection:
2011-05-05: BackTrack 5 – Penetration Testing Distribution 2013-01-19: BackTrack Reborn – Kali Linux Teaser 2015-07-01: Kali 2.0 Teaser – Kali Sana 2017-08-22: Kali 2017.1 – KDE Desktop Fun Hacked
We know everyone is a target, but also being apart of the industry we paint ourselves as a bigger target. From time-to-time we have made slip ups. Lucky, as far as we know, it never has been anything major, critical or user-facing:
2010-12-25: “Happy Ninja” low privileged shell by compromising another vHost on the same machine via an outdated vBulletin plug-in Their eZine: Owned and Exposed #2 2012-04-11 – Invalid 0-day privilage escalation in BackTrack advisory Really, it was WICD privilege escalation, BackTrack was already running as root, and it was more of a PR stunt 2013-05-01: OffSec launches Bug Bounty program, covering Kali Linux 2014-04-30: “The GreaT TeAm (TGT)"’s defacement of
lists.kali.org (via Heartbleed/CVE-2014-0160)
Low traffic, rarely used 3rd party hosted public mailing list 2016-03-31: “Team Bad Dream” gained moderation privileges on
forums.kali.org (socially engineered), which lead to failed defacement on
bugs.kali.org (suspect re-used credentials)
Also suspect impersonating user on IRC (failed attempt at requesting additional access to new services) Limited only to community support portals 2021-12-08: “0x0 keeper” used CVE-2021-43798 Grafana directory traversal (via OffSec’s bug bounty program) Used for system monitoring and alerts April Fools
We like a bit of fun, and have been known to pull pranks over the years:
2010-04-01: Backcrack-ng v1.1 2021-04-01: kali4kids 2022-04-01: Hollywood mode Kali4Kids
What started out as a poster put out by a government agency that did not give the message they were expecting.
In response, the community started to share how Kali is for the children.
With how much it was being used, it was shortened to “Kali For Kids”. So we figured, what would Kali look like IF it was made for kids.
“kali4kids” then became the internal name for next year’s April Fools joke. We have got enough ideas for things we want to try all the way to 2039!
The term “Dojo” relates to the martial arts, where you practised it. As there has always been a underlying theme of martial arts, it felt right to use.
Kali dojo, was a series of workshops given at mostly conferences. They would be hands on exercises, doing features with the OS that makes Kali, Kali: 2014-08-07: Black Hat USA 2014 2014-09-24: BruCon 2014 2014-09-27: DerbyCon 2014 2015-08-05: Black Hat USA 2015 2015-08-07: DEF CON 23 2016-03-24: IRC 2016-08-04: Black Hat USA 2016 2016-08-31: Ekoparty 12 2017-07-27: Black Hat USA 2017 2017-07-29: DEF CON 25 2018-08-09: Black Hat USA 2018 2018-08-11: DEF CON 26 2018-10-25: Wild West Hackin’ Fest 2018 2018-03-21: InfoSec World 2018
Online videos of 2015 dojos:
2015-02-25: Kali Dojo 02 – Building Custom Kali ISOs using Live Build 2015-02-26: Kali Dojo 03 – Kali Linux USB Persistence & Encryption 2015-03-06: Kali Dojo 04 – Kali on a Raspberry Pi with LUKS Disk Encryption